In your esteemed opinion, what’s the best phone on each carrier?

On T-mobile, I think it still goes to the HTC Sensation because of the large 4.3″ screen, solid camera performance, HSPA+ network speeds (although to be accurate, the most you’re going to get out of the Sensation is 14.4 Mbps) and the Snapdragon dual-core 1.2 GHz processor. However, the fairly new Samsung Galaxy S II and HTC Amaze look to be giving it solid competition.

The newly minted iPhone 4s makes the competition a little stiffer for the other 3 networks, but on Verizon, it’s going to have to go to an Android phone. Why? iPhone 4s simply doesn’t offer 4g speeds. That’s why I’ll have to go with Droid Bionic for Verizon’s winner, even though the 4.3″ screen doesn’t knock my socks off. (I’m super excited about the Samsung Note coming out on Big Red in Q1 2012, though.)

Even with the new iPhone, Sprint’s best phone still goes to an Android device, the Samsung Galazy S II. Snappy response time, graphics that pop and great speakerphone performance are just some of the reasons Samsung’s latest Galaxy model has been labeled an ‘iPhone killer.’

AT&T is the only carrier to give the new iPhone model 4g, or more accurately, faux g, love, and that is why I ‘m choosing it for the best phone on AT&T. The 8 megapixel camera delivers pretty stunning photos, it’s compatible with a huge array of accessories, and of course, there’s the Siri intelligent assistant that has everyone talking. (Get it? Talking? Ha! I kill myself!)

**If you’re in the market for a new phone, or simply want to research the latest mobile technology, PhoneScoop is a good way to get the information you need. http://bit.ly/ormu4F

I arrived back from Florida Wednesday evening after spending a few days shooting the CheerSurge cheerleading camp. The coaches were phenomenal and the campers absolutely delightful! I had no idea how much stamina, strength and practice went into their routines. They make it look easy!

I took over 1500 photos during my two-and-a-half days of shooting. I started processing them on the plane for home and finished up at about 7:30 this morning. I am just waiting on approval from the CheerSurge folks. Once I receive that, I’ll have the photos available for sale.

In the meantime, here’s my favorite shot from the camp. It’s not the best one – in fact, it’s really not even a good shot. It is, however, funny, and shows the skill level necessary to do cheerleading.

Google+ Dashboard

I was fortunate enough to get an invite yesterday to Google+ from one of my Twitter buddies and I’ve pretty much spent all my spare time since then on the site. The odd thing is that on the face of it, there’s nothing overly compelling about Google+. In fact, I find the barrage of information sort of overwhelming. (Although, to be fair, I find the barrage of information on Facebook overwhelming as well.)

There are plenty of articles on the web that explain what Google+ is and how to use it, so I’m not going to cover that. Rather, this will be a brief overview of my impressions.

First, I rather like that Google+ seems to be a cross between Twitter and Facebook. It’s like Twitter in that if you share something as public, then anyone on Google+ can comment. I like the openness and network building this encourages. It’s like Facebook in that I can keep posts restricted to particular groups, or Circles, such as friends, family, or even individual users. I also like that I can just click the name of the stream I want to see and everyone else is filtered out.

The Sparks feature is a favorite of mine – sort of a keyword-centric, curated Google Reader stream that resides unobtrusively on the left side of the page, waiting for a click. Hangouts, a group video conferencing tool, has been a big favorite of everyone else except me, mostly because I don’t feel like bothering with hair or makeup to talk tech.

Photos is where Google+ really shines, though. Tightly integrated with Picasa Web, Google’s online photo service, the interface is snappy and slick. Photo comments are listed to the right, and tagging and EXIF information are available as well. If you’re lucky enough to have an Android phone, you can choose to have any photos you take from your phone instantly available to your Google+ account (they’re set to private by default.)

I’m still getting my feet wet and there’s a lot to discover. I think it’s early yet to tell if Google+ will be a “Facebook killer” but its strong privacy controls, as well as the Google Takeout feature (you can export all your data and take it with you) make it a strong alternative to those that have concerns over Facebook’s usage of personal information. As of today, Google+ is a hit, but that probably has a lot to do with the fact that most of these early adopters are techies. I look forward to seeing how it develops as more diverse groups of people join and utilize it in real-world situations.

I love T-mobile – I really do. We’ve been on a family plan with them for over fix years – probably six or seven. We’ve always received excellent customer service, and compared to Verizon, Cingular (now AT&T) & Sprint, they’ve messed up on our bills remarkably less. (In fact, I can’t think of any major mistakes at all.) Based on my experiences with them, they are, I feel, a company that has integrity.

This is why their new 4G ads bug me. It’s not the fact that they are taking liberties with the definition of 4G (technically HSPA+ is not 4G/LTE.) It’s the rather spurious claims they’re making about the superiority of their data network overall.

Until recently, I had no reason to doubt their claims. However, a recent trip to New Orleans for the holidays proved to be an exercise in frustration and futility. With the exception of major cities (Houston, Lake Charles, Lafayette, Baton Rouge, New Orleans), the maximum download speed I was able to reach on my MyTouch 4G was about 13kbps. Meanwhile, my husband’s iPhone 3Gs was getting speeds in the neighborhood of 2015 kbps. (We were a bit closer on upload speeds; 10k for me, 14k for him.)

AT&T's data coverage between Houston & New Orleans

Upon reaching home, I did a little research and compared the two carrier’s coverage maps. AT&T’s map shows consistent 3G data coverage running the length and breadth of most of this nation’s highways, including the stretch of I-10 between Houston and New Orleans. T-mobile’s map shows small pockets of 4G speeds along the same route, but the Mobile Web (EDGE/GPRS) speeds are what’s primarily offered. Now I have no idea what top EDGE/GPRS speeds are supposed to be, but as I said, I never got above 13K in those areas.

T-mobile's data coverage from Houston to New Orleans

I find it rather annoying that T-mobile is now focused on adding 4G to their lineup when they don’t even have the basics built out. I would much rather stop and ask for information in a busy city than along a deserted stretch of highway. AT&T apparently understands that one has to walk before they run; I have a lot more faith in their long-term plan at this point.

About this blog

I blog of gadgets and digital hijinks.

Follow Me on Twitter!

Send a Free Card!

Login

Username:

Password: